Skip to content
Home  /  ANZCA Fellowship  /  Study notes  /  Pulmonary Hypertension: Pathophysiology and Manipulation of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance

Pulmonary Hypertension: Pathophysiology and Manipulation of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance

● ANZCA Fellowship LO SS_TS 1.4 1,969 words
Free preview. This study note covers learning objective SS_TS 1.4 from the ANZCA Fellowship curriculum. Inside PRIMEX you get AI-graded SAQ practice on this topic, voice viva with the AI examiner, MCQs across the full syllabus, and a curriculum tracker that ticks off every learning objective.

Definition and Haemodynamic Classification

Normal Pulmonary Vascular Pressures

Parameter Normal Value
Pulmonary artery systolic pressure ~22 mmHg
Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure ~8 mmHg
Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ~13 mmHg
Mean pulmonary capillary pressure ~10 mmHg
Mean pulmonary venous pressure ~4 mmHg
Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) ~2-3 mmHg above LAP
Transpulmonary gradient (mPAP, PAOP) < 12 mmHg (normal)
Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ~1/10 of SVR

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Formula

$$PVR = \frac{mPAP - PAOP}{CO} \times 80$$


Pathophysiology of Pulmonary Hypertension

Vascular Tone and Vasoconstriction

The NO-cGMP Pathway

Nitric oxide (NO) is a key endogenous pulmonary vasodilator synthesised in endothelial cells. Its mechanism:

  1. NO diffuses into vascular smooth muscle cells
  2. Activates soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) → converts GTP to cyclic GMP (cGMP)
  3. Elevated cGMP activates protein kinase G → smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilation

The Endothelin Pathway

Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictor and mitogen, acts via $ET_A$ and $ET_B$ receptors on pulmonary vascular smooth muscle. In PH, ET-1 levels are elevated and contribute to:

$ET_B$ receptor effects predominate in the clinical context, and antagonism reduces pulmonary artery pressure.

Vascular Remodelling

Beyond vasoconstriction, chronic PH involves structural changes:

These structural changes render some component of elevated PVR irreversible, differentiating "reactive" (vasoreactive) from "fixed" PH.

Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction (HPV)

Classification (WHO Groups)

WHO Group Aetiology
Group 1 Pulmonary arterial hypertension (idiopathic, heritable, drug-induced)
Group 2 Left heart disease (most common; raised PAOP)
Group 3 Lung disease and/or hypoxia (COPD, ILD, OSA)
Group 4 Chronic thromboembolic PH
Group 5 Unclear or multifactorial mechanisms

Right Ventricular Consequences

Progressive elevation in PVR imposes afterload on the right ventricle (RV). The thin-walled RV is poorly adapted to acute pressure overload:


Monitoring of Pulmonary Haemodynamics

Pulmonary Artery Catheter (PAC)

The Swan-Ganz catheter remains the gold standard for direct measurement of pulmonary haemodynamics. It allows measurement of:

Additional Monitoring Modalities


Methods to Manipulate Pulmonary Vascular Resistance

Ventilatory and Physiological Strategies

Optimising ventilation is the most immediately accessible tool for the anaesthetist managing elevated PVR intraoperatively.

Parameter Effect on PVR Target
$PaO_2$ Hypoxia → vasoconstriction $FiO_2$ to maintain $SpO_2$ > 94%
$PaCO_2$ Hypercapnia/acidosis → vasoconstriction Normocarbia ($PaCO_2$ 35-40 mmHg) or mild hypocarbia
pH Acidosis → vasoconstriction pH ≥ 7.40
Lung volume Both over and under-inflation increase PVR Functional residual capacity (FRC)
Sympathetic stimulation Pain, anxiety, light anaesthesia → vasoconstriction Adequate depth

Pharmacological Approaches: Pulmonary Vasodilators

Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO)

Mechanism: NO activates sGC in pulmonary vascular smooth muscle → elevated cGMP → vasodilation. Being inhaled, NO selectively dilates vessels in ventilated lung units, this is the key advantage:

Clinical indications: Neonatal hypoxic respiratory failure with PH, severe PAH, acute RV failure post-cardiac surgery, bridge to transplantation.

PDE5 Inhibitors (Sildenafil, Tadalafil)

Effect: Pulmonary vasodilation, reduction of mPAP and PVR, improved RV function.

Toxicity: Systemic hypotension (particularly combined with nitrates or iNO), priapism.

sGC Stimulators (Riociguat)

Effect: Smooth muscle relaxation, pulmonary vasodilation.

Endothelin Receptor Antagonists (Bosentan, Ambrisentan, Macitentan)

Route: Oral.

Perioperative relevance: Significant hepatotoxicity and drug interactions (CYP450); continue perioperatively as abrupt cessation may precipitate PH crisis.

Prostanoids (Epoprostenol, Iloprost)

Calcium Channel Antagonists

Pulmonary Vasoconstrictors


Anaesthetic Implications and Perioperative Management

Risk Stratification

PH carries significant perioperative risk:

Goals of Anaesthetic Management

Goal Rationale
Maintain RV afterload (avoid PVR increase) RV is poorly adapted to acute pressure rises
Maintain RV preload (avoid hypovolaemia) RV requires adequate filling
Avoid RV overdistension Septal shift worsens LV filling
Maintain sinus rhythm and RV contractility RV is rate-dependent; loss of AV synchrony catastrophic
Maintain coronary perfusion to RV RV perfuses in both systole and diastole; SVR must exceed mPAP
Avoid systemic hypotension Further reduces RV coronary perfusion

Specific Intraoperative Strategies

Crisis Management: Acute RV Failure / PH Crisis

An acute PH crisis (sudden mPAP spike, RV failure, cardiovascular collapse) is a perioperative emergency:

  1. 100% oxygen: immediately reduces HPV contribution
  2. Correct acidosis: hyperventilation, sodium bicarbonate if severe
  3. Inhaled NO: immediate pulmonary vasodilation without systemic hypotension
  4. Vasopressin/noradrenaline: restore RV coronary perfusion pressure (SVR > mPAP)
  5. Inotropic support: milrinone, dobutamine for RV contractility
  6. Consider ECMO: venoarterial ECMO as rescue if refractory; note ECMO itself does not reduce pulmonary vascular pressures
  7. Avoid escalating PEEP: increases PVR

Monitoring Considerations

In patients with significant PH undergoing major procedures:

The understanding that the pulmonary vasculature is highly responsive to physiological and pharmacological manipulation, particularly through the NO-cGMP-PDE5 pathway and endothelin axis, underpins rational perioperative management of this high-risk patient group.

PRIMEX

Practice this topic in the app

Attempt a graded SAQ on this exact LO, run a voice viva with the AI examiner, or work through MCQs that map to SS_TS 1.4. Your free trial covers all 26 exams.

Start 7-day free trial

7-day free trial · Cancel anytime

Quick recall flashcards

A small sample of the deck for this topic. Tap a question to reveal the answer. The full deck and spaced-repetition scheduler live inside PRIMEX.

Why do PDE5 inhibitors (e.g. sildenafil, tadalafil) preferentially reduce pulmonary rather than systemic vascular resistance?
  • PDE5 is enriched in pulmonary vascular smooth muscle compared to systemic vessels
  • PDE5 breaks down cGMP; its inhibition prolongs cGMP-mediated vasodilation
  • Result: selective pulmonary vasodilation with proportionally less systemic effect
  • Also used in erectile dysfunction via the same cGMP mechanism in corpora cavernosa
  • Sildenafil dose for PAH: 20 mg TDS orally; tadalafil 40 mg daily
What is hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) and what is its physiological purpose?
  • Local vasoconstriction of pulmonary arterioles in response to low alveolar $PO_2$
  • Diverts blood flow away from poorly ventilated lung regions toward better-ventilated areas
  • Optimises $\dot{V}/\dot{Q}$ matching and minimises intrapulmonary shunt
  • Unique to pulmonary vasculature, systemic vessels dilate in response to hypoxia
What alveolar $PO_2$ threshold triggers HPV, and how much does HPV reduce shunt flow during one-lung ventilation (OLV)?
  • HPV is triggered when alveolar $PO_2$ falls below approximately $8 \ kPa$ ($60 \ mmHg$)
  • Response is maximal when alveolar $PO_2$ is near $4 \ kPa$ ($30 \ mmHg$)
  • During OLV, expected shunt through non-ventilated lung is $40\text{-}50\%$ of cardiac output
  • HPV reduces this to approximately $20\text{-}30\%$, significantly attenuating hypoxaemia
At what ages does closing capacity (CC) exceed FRC in supine vs upright positions?
  • CC exceeds FRC in the supine position at approximately age 45 years
  • CC exceeds FRC in the upright position at approximately age 65 years
  • CC changes slowly over years; FRC fluctuates minute-to-minute
  • Anaesthesia accelerates FRC reduction in all positions
  • Clinical implication: older supine patients are particularly vulnerable to airway closure during tidal breathing even without anaesthesia
Start free trial→