Skip to content
Home  /  ANZCA Fellowship  /  Study notes  /  Paediatric Regional Anaesthesia: Differences in Performance Compared with Adults

Paediatric Regional Anaesthesia: Differences in Performance Compared with Adults

● ANZCA Fellowship LO SS_PA 1.92 2,138 words
Free preview. This study note covers learning objective SS_PA 1.92 from the ANZCA Fellowship curriculum. Inside PRIMEX you get AI-graded SAQ practice on this topic, voice viva with the AI examiner, MCQs across the full syllabus, and a curriculum tracker that ticks off every learning objective.

Overview and Rationale for Paediatric Regional Anaesthesia


Anatomical Differences and Their Technical Implications

Neuraxial Anatomy

Feature Neonate/Infant Adult
Conus medullaris level L2-L3 (term neonate) L1
Dural sac termination S3-S4 S1-S2
Sacral hiatus Wider, more superficial Narrower, deeper
Spinal cord myelination Incomplete Complete
Vertebral ossification Incomplete (more cartilaginous) Complete
Epidural fat Loose, gelatinous More fibrous
Depth to epidural space Very shallow (approx. 1 mm/kg) 4-6 cm in most adults

Peripheral Nerve Anatomy

Peripheral nerves in neonates and small infants are less myelinated and have less surrounding connective tissue. This means:


Physiological Differences Affecting Block Performance

Cardiovascular Response to Neuraxial Block

In practice:

Respiratory Effects and Apnoea Risk

Pharmacokinetic Differences

Key differences affecting local anaesthetic dosing in neonates and infants:

Parameter Neonate/Infant Adult
Plasma protein binding (alpha-1 acid glycoprotein) Reduced Normal
Hepatic enzyme maturity (CYP1A2, CYP3A4) Reduced (especially < 3 months) Mature
Volume of distribution Larger (higher total body water) Smaller
Renal clearance Reduced in neonates Normal
Risk of LA systemic toxicity Higher (especially amides) Lower per weight

Dosing practices for peripheral nerve blocks in children are noted to sometimes approach or exceed safe dose limits, and this occurs more commonly in younger children, a key safety concern.


Specific Techniques: Performance Differences

Spinal Anaesthesia

Parameter Neonate/Infant Adult
Preferred level L4-L5 L2-L3 or L3-L4
Position Lateral or sitting Lateral or sitting
LA dose (hyperbaric bupivacaine) 0.3-1.0 mg/kg 2-3 mL fixed dose
Duration of block Shorter (30-60 min) 90-180 min
Haemodynamic instability Uncommon Common
Sedation requirement None ideal (awake technique) None required

Intrathecal opioids provide prolonged analgesia after surgery in children and reduce blood loss during paediatric spinal fusion; however, high doses of intrathecal morphine have been associated with respiratory failure and ICU admission.

Epidural and Caudal Anaesthesia

Feature Caudal (Paediatric) Lumbar/Thoracic Epidural (Adult)
Approach Via sacral hiatus Lumbar or thoracic interspace
Spread predictability High in infants Moderate
Catheter threading to thoracic level Feasible in neonates/infants Not typically done caudally
Use in adults Rarely Routinely

In young children having laparotomy, early epidural catheter removal occurred in 35% of cases, most commonly due to inadequate analgesia and technical failure, reflecting the challenges of catheter management in this population.

Major Plexus Blocks

The same plexus blocks used in adults (brachial plexus, femoral nerve, sciatic nerve, fascia iliaca) are applicable in children, with modifications:


Safety Profile: Age-Related Differences

Overall Complication Rates

Large-scale paediatric audits demonstrate that PRA has a low overall complication rate, comparable to adult practice, when performed under general anaesthesia by experienced practitioners.

Audit n (blocks) Overall complication rate
Giaufre 1996 24,409 0.09%
Ecoffey 2010 31,142 0.12%
Polaner/PRAN 2012 14,917 0.2%
Taenzer/PRAN 2014 53,564 1.2%
Walker/PRAN 2018 104,393 Specific adverse effects reported

Age-Specific Risk

Younger age is consistently associated with higher complication rates:

Blocks Under General Anaesthesia vs Awake

This paradox is explained by the inherent difficulty of obtaining reliable neurological feedback from a distressed, moving child, the risk of sudden movement during needle placement, and the ability to use real-time ultrasound under controlled conditions when the child is anaesthetised.

Parameter Paediatric (GA) Adult (Awake)
Major adverse event rate 2.2/10,000 15.2/10,000 (awake paediatric)
Standard of care Blocks under GA Awake, with neurological monitoring
Neurological deficit (permanent) 0/10,000 (95% CI 0-0.4) Rare

LAST in Children


Adjuvant Medications

Several adjuvants extend block duration and quality in children:

Adjuvant Route Evidence
Clonidine Caudal, epidural, perineural Improves analgesia (Level I)
Dexmedetomidine Caudal, epidural, perineural Improves analgesia (Level II)
Dexamethasone Caudal, perineural, IV Prolongs analgesia (Level I)
Magnesium Caudal Improves analgesia (Level I)
Ketamine Caudal Prolongs analgesia but neurotoxicity concerns (Level I)

Adjuvants should demonstrate a viable local mechanism of action beyond systemic administration and must be safe and non-toxic in the paediatric context.


Perioperative Management

Pre-procedure Assessment and Consent

Technique Selection Principles

Dosing Safety

Monitoring

Specific Block Applications

Surgery Preferred Technique Key Considerations
Inguinal hernia (ex-premature) Awake spinal ± caudal Reduces early apnoea; prematurity strongest apnoea predictor
Circumcision Caudal, DPNB, or ring block Topical LA alone inadequate
Lower abdominal/perineal Caudal single shot Effective, low serious complication rate
Thoracic/abdominal (major) Thoracic epidural or caudal catheter Epidural comparable to systemic opioid; higher catheter complication rate in neonates
Scoliosis surgery Epidural + IV PCA Improves pain scores and patient satisfaction
Upper limb USS-guided brachial plexus block Weight-based dosing; under GA
Lower limb Femoral/sciatic or fascia iliaca Continuous catheters feasible
Cleft lip Infraorbital nerve block Effective with lidocaine or bupivacaine
PRIMEX

Practice this topic in the app

Attempt a graded SAQ on this exact LO, run a voice viva with the AI examiner, or work through MCQs that map to SS_PA 1.92. Your free trial covers all 26 exams.

Start 7-day free trial

7-day free trial · Cancel anytime

Quick recall flashcards

A small sample of the deck for this topic. Tap a question to reveal the answer. The full deck and spaced-repetition scheduler live inside PRIMEX.

List the absolute contraindications to central neuraxial blockade (CNB)
  • Patient refusal
  • Lack of adequate consent or cooperation
  • Coagulopathy (clinically significant, e.g. therapeutic anticoagulation not ceased, inherited coagulopathy with active bleeding risk)
  • Severe uncorrected hypovolaemia / haemodynamic instability
  • Raised intracranial pressure (risk of brainstem herniation with dural puncture)
  • Infection at or immediately adjacent to the proposed needle insertion site
  • Allergy to all available local anaesthetic agents
List the relative contraindications to central neuraxial blockade (CNB)
  • Antiplatelet therapy (timing and agent dependent)
  • Anticoagulants within recommended cessation windows
  • Septicaemia / bacteraemia (risk of seeding to epidural/intrathecal space)
  • Coagulopathy not meeting absolute threshold (e.g. thrombocytopaenia 50-100 × 10⁹/L)
  • Pre-existing neurological deficit in the distribution of the proposed block
  • Spinal deformity or prior spinal surgery (technical difficulty, altered spread)
  • Uncooperative patient (no absolute refusal, but safety compromised)
  • Fixed cardiac output states (aortic stenosis, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy), relative, not absolute
  • Demyelinating disease (controversial; medicolegal risk)
  • Tattooing over insertion site (theoretical risk of pigment introduction)
What non-pharmacological measures reduce the incidence of hypotension after neuraxial blockade?
  • Left lateral uterine displacement in pregnant patients (reduces aortocaval compression)
  • Avoid supine position; use 15° left tilt or manual displacement
  • Graduated block height where possible (epidural preferred over spinal in haemodynamically fragile patients)
  • Avoid rapid position changes after block placement
  • Application of lower-limb compression (stockings or pneumatic) reduces venous pooling
  • Ensure adequate pre-procedural hydration
List the causes of nausea and vomiting associated with central neuraxial blockade
  • Hypotension → cerebral and gut hypoperfusion → chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) activation
  • High block (≥ T5) → unopposed vagal tone → increased gut motility and nausea
  • Intrathecal/epidural opioid administration (especially morphine, fentanyl)
  • Visceral peritoneal traction intraoperatively
  • Anxiety and pain
  • Uterine exteriorisation during Caesarean section
  • Blood or amniotic fluid contamination of peritoneal cavity
Start free trial→