Home  /  ANZCA Fellowship  /  Study notes  /  Paediatric Regional Anaesthesia: Differences in Performance Compared with Adults

Paediatric Regional Anaesthesia: Differences in Performance Compared with Adults

ANZCA Fellowship LO SS_PA 1.92 1,958 words
Free preview. This study note maps to learning objective SS_PA 1.92 in the ANZCA Fellowship curriculum. Inside Primex you get the full set of ANZCA Fellowship notes, AI-graded SAQs and written-paper practice, voice viva with an AI examiner, exam-style MCQs, and a curriculum tracker that ticks off every learning objective as you go. For exam format, timeline and failure-mode commentary, see the ANZCA Fellowship 2026 Study Guide.

SS_PA 1.92 - Spinal, Epidural, and Major Plexus Blocks in Neonates and Children


Overview and Rationale for Paediatric Regional Anaesthesia

Paediatric regional anaesthesia (PRA) encompasses peripheral nerve blocks, neuraxial techniques (spinal, epidural, caudal), and catheter-based continuous infusion techniques. The fundamental goals - surgical anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia, and opioid-sparing - are shared with adult practice, but the anatomical, physiological, and pharmacological differences between children (particularly neonates and infants) and adults profoundly affect how these techniques are performed, dosed, and monitored.

A critical operational difference is that PRA is almost universally performed under general anaesthesia or deep sedation in children, rather than in the awake patient as is conventional in adults. This is supported by large-scale safety data from the Paediatric Regional Anaesthesia Network (PRAN) and multiple international audits covering over 100,000 blocks.


Anatomical Differences and Their Technical Implications

Neuraxial Anatomy

Feature Neonate/Infant Adult
Conus medullaris level L2-L3 (term neonate) L1
Dural sac termination S3-S4 S1-S2
Sacral hiatus Wider, more superficial Narrower, deeper
Spinal cord myelination Incomplete Complete
Vertebral ossification Incomplete (more cartilaginous) Complete
Epidural fat Loose, gelatinous More fibrous
Depth to epidural space Very shallow (approx. 1 mm/kg) 4-6 cm in most adults

The more caudal conus position in neonates means lumbar spinal techniques carry a higher risk of direct cord injury if the correct interspace is not identified; the L4-L5 interspace is the recommended level for neonatal spinal puncture. The loose epidural fat in infants facilitates longitudinal spread of local anaesthetic from caudal injections, allowing catheters threaded from the sacral hiatus to reach thoracic levels - a unique paediatric technique.

Peripheral Nerve Anatomy

Peripheral nerves in neonates and small infants are less myelinated and have less surrounding connective tissue. This means: - Onset of block is faster - Spread of local anaesthetic around nerve fascicles is more extensive - Volume requirements per unit weight are generally lower, though weight-based dosing is still used

Ultrasound guidance has become the standard of care for peripheral nerve block placement in children; structures are superficial and highly echogenic, making real-time visualisation straightforward. Continuous ultrasound-guided caudal injection increases first-puncture success and lowers the risk of vascular puncture and inadvertent subcutaneous injection compared to landmark technique.


Physiological Differences Affecting Block Performance

Cardiovascular Response to Neuraxial Block

Unlike adults, neonates and young children (under approximately 8 years) demonstrate a markedly attenuated haemodynamic response to neuraxial sympathectomy. This is attributed to the relatively underdeveloped sympathetic nervous system and lower resting sympathetic tone. In practice:

Respiratory Effects and Apnoea Risk

Spinal and regional anaesthesia offers a specific advantage in the ex-premature infant population. Prematurity is the strongest predictor of postoperative apnoea (OR 22; 95% CI 4-109). Primary regional anaesthesia (spinal, caudal, or combined) reduces the incidence of early apnoea (0-0.5 h) compared to general anaesthesia, though late apnoea rates (0.5-12 h) are not significantly different.

This underpins the role of awake spinal anaesthesia in ex-premature infants (post-menstrual age $\leq$ 60 weeks) having inguinal hernia repair, where avoiding volatile agents reduces but does not eliminate apnoea risk. Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 and 5 years do not differ between regional and general anaesthesia groups.

Pharmacokinetic Differences

Key differences affecting local anaesthetic dosing in neonates and infants:

Parameter Neonate/Infant Adult
Plasma protein binding (alpha-1 acid glycoprotein) Reduced Normal
Hepatic enzyme maturity (CYP1A2, CYP3A4) Reduced (especially < 3 months) Mature
Volume of distribution Larger (higher total body water) Smaller
Renal clearance Reduced in neonates Normal
Risk of LA systemic toxicity Higher (especially amides) Lower per weight

The reduced plasma protein binding increases the free fraction of amide local anaesthetics, increasing LAST risk. Neonatal hepatic immaturity slows metabolism of amide agents (lidocaine, bupivacaine, ropivacaine). For continuous infusions in neonates and young infants, maximum infusion rates must be reduced relative to older children and adults.

Dosing practices for peripheral nerve blocks in children are noted to sometimes approach or exceed safe dose limits, and this occurs more commonly in younger children - a key safety concern.


Specific Techniques: Performance Differences

Spinal Anaesthesia

Parameter Neonate/Infant Adult
Preferred level L4-L5 L2-L3 or L3-L4
Position Lateral or sitting Lateral or sitting
LA dose (hyperbaric bupivacaine) 0.3-1.0 mg/kg 2-3 mL fixed dose
Duration of block Shorter (30-60 min) 90-180 min
Haemodynamic instability Uncommon Common
Sedation requirement None ideal (awake technique) None required

The shorter duration of spinal block in neonates is clinically important - the surgery must be completed within the block window. The higher cerebrospinal fluid volume per kilogram in infants ($\sim$ 4 mL/kg vs $\sim$ 2 mL/kg in adults) contributes to greater dilution of intrathecal local anaesthetic and shorter block duration.

Intrathecal opioids provide prolonged analgesia after surgery in children and reduce blood loss during paediatric spinal fusion; however, high doses of intrathecal morphine have been associated with respiratory failure and ICU admission.

Epidural and Caudal Anaesthesia

The caudal approach to the epidural space is the most commonly performed neuraxial technique in children and is largely unique to paediatric practice. It exploits the easily identifiable sacral hiatus, the loose epidural fat, and the predictable spread of local anaesthetic to provide analgesia for lower abdominal, perineal, and lower limb surgery.

Feature Caudal (Paediatric) Lumbar/Thoracic Epidural (Adult)
Approach Via sacral hiatus Lumbar or thoracic interspace
Spread predictability High in infants Moderate
Catheter threading to thoracic level Feasible in neonates/infants Not typically done caudally
Use in adults Rarely Routinely

For thoracic and major abdominal surgery in children, epidural catheters may be placed via the lumbar or thoracic interspace or threaded cephalad from the caudal approach. Epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil combinations are used; however, catheter-related complications in neonates with neuraxial catheters are notable - a US multicentre safety analysis reported a 13.3% complication rate (catheter malfunction, contamination, vascular puncture) in neonates with neuraxial catheters, though no complications resulted in long-term sequelae and serious complication risk was 0.3/10,000.

In young children having laparotomy, early epidural catheter removal occurred in 35% of cases, most commonly due to inadequate analgesia and technical failure, reflecting the challenges of catheter management in this population.

Continuous epidural infusions provide effective postoperative analgesia in children of all ages. Epidural infusions of local anaesthetic provide similar analgesia to systemic opioid infusion. Epidural opioids alone are less effective than epidural local anaesthetic or combinations of local anaesthetic and opioid.

Major Plexus Blocks

The same plexus blocks used in adults (brachial plexus, femoral nerve, sciatic nerve, fascia iliaca) are applicable in children, with modifications:


Safety Profile: Age-Related Differences

Overall Complication Rates

Large-scale paediatric audits demonstrate that PRA has a low overall complication rate, comparable to adult practice, when performed under general anaesthesia by experienced practitioners.

Audit n (blocks) Overall complication rate
Giaufre 1996 24,409 0.09%
Ecoffey 2010 31,142 0.12%
Polaner/PRAN 2012 14,917 0.2%
Taenzer/PRAN 2014 53,564 1.2%
Walker/PRAN 2018 104,393 Specific adverse effects reported

Age-Specific Risk

Younger age is consistently associated with higher complication rates:

Blocks Under General Anaesthesia vs Awake

A critical safety finding specific to paediatric practice is that blocks placed under general anaesthesia have a lower combined incidence of major adverse events (LAST and neurological deficit together: 2.2/10,000) compared to blocks placed awake or with sedation (15.2/10,000). This is the inverse of the adult paradigm, where awake techniques are preferred to allow neurological feedback during needle placement.

This paradox is explained by the inherent difficulty of obtaining reliable neurological feedback from a distressed, moving child, the risk of sudden movement during needle placement, and the ability to use real-time ultrasound under controlled conditions when the child is anaesthetised.

Parameter Paediatric (GA) Adult (Awake)
Major adverse event rate 2.2/10,000 15.2/10,000 (awake paediatric)
Standard of care Blocks under GA Awake, with neurological monitoring
Neurological deficit (permanent) 0/10,000 (95% CI 0-0.4) Rare

LAST in Children

LAST risk is higher in neonates and infants due to pharmacokinetic factors above. Lipid emulsion 20% is used for resuscitation in paediatric LAST (neonates to 18 years) with the same dosing recommendations as adults; higher doses have led to adverse effects in children.


Adjuvant Medications

Several adjuvants extend block duration and quality in children:

Adjuvant Route Evidence
Clonidine Caudal, epidural, perineural Improves analgesia (Level I)
Dexmedetomidine Caudal, epidural, perineural Improves analgesia (Level II)
Dexamethasone Caudal, perineural, IV Prolongs analgesia (Level I)
Magnesium Caudal Improves analgesia (Level I)
Ketamine Caudal Prolongs analgesia but neurotoxicity concerns (Level I)

Adjuvants should demonstrate a viable local mechanism of action beyond systemic administration and must be safe and non-toxic in the paediatric context.


Perioperative Management

Pre-procedure Assessment and Consent

Technique Selection Principles

Dosing Safety

Monitoring

Specific Block Applications

Surgery Preferred Technique Key Considerations
Inguinal hernia (ex-premature) Awake spinal ± caudal Reduces early apnoea; prematurity strongest apnoea predictor
Circumcision Caudal, DPNB, or ring block Topical LA alone inadequate
Lower abdominal/perineal Caudal single shot Effective, low serious complication rate
Thoracic/abdominal (major) Thoracic epidural or caudal catheter Epidural comparable to systemic opioid; higher catheter complication rate in neonates
Scoliosis surgery Epidural + IV PCA Improves pain scores and patient satisfaction
Upper limb USS-guided brachial plexus block Weight-based dosing; under GA
Lower limb Femoral/sciatic or fascia iliaca Continuous catheters feasible
Cleft lip Infraorbital nerve block Effective with lidocaine or bupivacaine
Primex

Practice this topic in the app

Work through MCQs on this exact LO, run written or viva practice mapped to SS_PA 1.92, or ask PRIMEX a clinical question framed for ANZCA Fellowship. Your free trial covers all 20 specialist exams.

Start 7-day free trial

Quick recall flashcards

A small sample of the deck for this topic. Tap a question to reveal the answer. The full deck and spaced-repetition scheduler live inside Primex.

List the absolute contraindications to central neuraxial blockade (CNB)

- Patient refusal - Lack of adequate consent or cooperation - Coagulopathy (clinically significant, e.g. therapeutic anticoagulation not ceased, inherited coagulopathy with active bleeding risk) - Severe uncorrected hypovolaemia / haemodynamic instability - Raised intracranial pressure (risk of brainstem herniation with dural puncture) - Infection at or immediately adjacent to the proposed needle insertion site - Allergy to all available local anaesthetic agents

List the relative contraindications to central neuraxial blockade (CNB)

- Antiplatelet therapy (timing and agent dependent) - Anticoagulants within recommended cessation windows - Septicaemia / bacteraemia (risk of seeding to epidural/intrathecal space) - Coagulopathy not meeting absolute threshold (e.g. thrombocytopaenia 50-100 × 10⁹/L) - Pre-existing neurological deficit in the distribution of the proposed block - Spinal deformity or prior spinal surgery (technical difficulty, altered spread) - Uncooperative patient (no absolute refusal, but safety compromised) - Fixed cardiac output states (aortic stenosis, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy) - relative, not absolute - Demyelinating disease (controversial; medicolegal risk) - Tattooing over insertion site (theoretical risk of pigment introduction)

Classify the contraindications to CNB by category

- **Patient factors** - Refusal / inadequate consent - Uncooperative patient - **Haematological** - Absolute: active anticoagulation not ceased, clinically significant coagulopathy - Relative: thrombocytopaenia (50-100 × 10⁹/L), dual antiplatelet therapy - **Infective** - Absolute: local site infection - Relative: systemic sepsis / bacteraemia - **Neurological** - Absolute: raised ICP - Relative: pre-existing neurological deficit, demyelinating disease - **Cardiovascular** - Relative: severe hypovolaemia, fixed cardiac output states - **Anatomical / Technical** - Severe spinal deformity, prior instrumented fusion, uncorrectable positioning

What platelet count thresholds are relevant to decision-making for CNB?

- $> 100 \times 10^9/L$: generally considered safe for neuraxial procedures - $80{-}100 \times 10^9/L$: acceptable in many clinical contexts with individual risk-benefit assessment - $< 80 \times 10^9/L$: significant increased risk; CNB generally avoided (relative contraindication approaching absolute) - $< 50 \times 10^9/L$: widely regarded as absolute contraindication - Rate of change and aetiology of thrombocytopaenia must be considered alongside the absolute value

Start free trial