Home  /  ANZCA Fellowship  /  Study notes  /  Airway Assessment Methods and Predictors of Difficult Airway Management

Airway Assessment Methods and Predictors of Difficult Airway Management

ANZCA Fellowship LO BT_AM 1.8 1,550 words
Free preview. This study note maps to learning objective BT_AM 1.8 in the ANZCA Fellowship curriculum. Inside Primex you get the full set of ANZCA Fellowship notes, AI-graded SAQs and written-paper practice, voice viva with an AI examiner, exam-style MCQs, and a curriculum tracker that ticks off every learning objective as you go. For exam format, timeline and failure-mode commentary, see the ANZCA Fellowship 2026 Study Guide.

BT_AM 1.8 - ANZCA Fellowship Study Notes


Overview and Clinical Importance

Preoperative airway assessment is a fundamental component of the pre-anaesthesia consultation and a core consultant anaesthetist competency. The primary goal is to identify patients in whom laryngoscopy, intubation, mask ventilation, supraglottic airway placement, or surgical airway access may be difficult or impossible, allowing appropriate planning, equipment preparation, and patient communication before anaesthesia is induced.

Failure to anticipate a difficult airway remains a leading cause of anaesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. A structured, systematic approach to airway assessment - integrated with history, examination, and relevant investigations - is essential perioperative practice.


Definitions

Term Definition
Difficult mask ventilation Inability of an unassisted anaesthetist to maintain $SpO_2 > 90\%$ with $FiO_2 = 1.0$ using positive-pressure mask ventilation
Difficult laryngoscopy Unable to visualise any part of the vocal cords with conventional laryngoscopy (Cormack-Lehane grade 3-4)
Difficult intubation Tracheal intubation requiring more than three attempts or more than 10 minutes
Failed intubation Inability to place tracheal tube after multiple attempts
Difficult surgical airway Inability to perform emergency front-of-neck access

History

A targeted history should precede physical examination. Key elements include:

Previous Anaesthetic History

Symptoms Suggesting Airway Pathology

Relevant Conditions


Physical Examination - Components of the Airway Assessment

The ASA Task Force components of the airway examination provide a comprehensive framework:

Mouth Opening (Inter-incisor Distance)

Finding Threshold of Concern
Inter-incisor (or inter-gum if edentulous) distance $< 3$ cm

Normal adult mouth opening is approximately 4-6 cm. Reduced mouth opening limits laryngoscope blade insertion and manoeuvring.

Dentition

Mallampati Classification

Performed with the patient seated, mouth fully open, tongue maximally protruded, and phonation avoided. Assesses pharyngeal space visibility.

Class Structures Visible
I Soft palate, fauces, uvula, tonsillar pillars
II Soft palate, fauces, uvula
III Soft palate, base of uvula only
IV Hard palate only - soft palate not visible

Thyromental Distance

$$TMD = \text{distance from thyroid notch to bony chin (mentum) with neck fully extended}$$

Finding Threshold of Concern
Thyromental distance $< 6$ cm

A short thyromental distance suggests a relatively posterior larynx, reduced submandibular space compliance, or both - indicating that the larynx will be more anterior and difficult to visualise at laryngoscopy.

Mandibular Space Compliance

Neck Length and Circumference

Head and Neck Range of Motion

Finding Threshold of Concern
Unable to touch chin to chest (flexion) Concerning
Unable to extend neck Concerning

Facial Hair


Multivariate Predictive Models

No single test reliably predicts all difficult airways. Combining multiple variables increases predictive accuracy.

Wilson Risk Score

Combines five factors: weight, head and neck movement, jaw movement, receding mandible, and buck teeth. Scores ≥2 suggest increased risk.

LEMON Score (Emergency Airway)

Letter Assessment
L Look externally (trauma, obesity, beard, large tongue)
E Evaluate 3-3-2 rule
M Mallampati score
O Obstruction (foreign body, epiglottitis, abscess)
N Neck mobility

The 3-3-2 Rule

Measurement Description Threshold
Mouth opening 3 finger-breadths between incisors $< 3$ finger-breadths concerning
Mandible length 3 finger-breadths from chin to hyoid $< 3$ finger-breadths concerning
Hyoid to thyroid notch 2 finger-breadths $< 2$ finger-breadths concerning

Predictors of Difficult Mask Ventilation

The mnemonic MOANS summarises key predictors:

Letter Factor
M Mask seal (beard, abnormal facial anatomy, trauma)
O Obese / Obstruction (BMI $> 26$ kg/m²)
A Age $> 55$ years
N No teeth (edentulous - loss of facial support)
S Snores / Stiff lungs (OSA, COPD, asthma)

Predictors of Difficult Supraglottic Airway Placement

The mnemonic RODS:

Letter Factor
R Restricted mouth opening
O Obstruction at or below glottis
D Distorted airway or supraglottic anatomy
S Stiff lungs / Spine (limited neck extension)

Predictors of Difficult Front-of-Neck Access (FONA)


Special Investigations

Imaging

Endoscopic Assessment


Documentation

The ANZCA pre-anaesthesia consultation requires documented airway and dental condition assessment in the anaesthetic record. This must include: - Findings of the structured examination - Mallampati class - Relevant measurements (inter-incisor distance, thyromental distance) - Risk classification - Planned airway strategy and contingency planning


Anaesthetic Implications

Risk Stratification and Planning

Every patient should be stratified as: 1. Predicted normal airway - standard technique, maintain backup equipment ready 2. Predicted difficult airway - primary technique modified, all rescue equipment available, surgical team aware 3. Known difficult airway - awake technique (e.g. awake fibreoptic intubation) strongly favoured; human factors optimised

Decision Framework for Predicted Difficult Airway

Factor Consideration
Predicted difficult intubation AND easy mask ventilation Video laryngoscopy as primary; modified RSI may be appropriate
Predicted difficult intubation AND difficult mask ventilation Awake fibreoptic intubation preferred; avoid paralysis before airway secured
Cannot-intubate-cannot-oxygenate risk Surgical airway prep, pre-mark CTM, FONA equipment immediately available
Tumour/extrinsic compression Consider fibreoptic bronchoscopy under sedation to assess and simultaneously intubate
Significant tracheal/subglottic stenosis Bronchoscopic assessment under sedation; ETT positioned above/across lesion as appropriate; tube changer at extubation

Key Perioperative Principles

OSA-Specific Considerations

Human Factors and Communication


A thorough, systematic airway assessment - integrating history, structured physical examination, multivariate scoring, and targeted investigations - remains the cornerstone of safe anaesthetic planning and the prevention of critical airway events.

Primex

Practice this topic in the app

Work through MCQs on this exact LO, run written or viva practice mapped to BT_AM 1.8, or ask PRIMEX a clinical question framed for ANZCA Fellowship. Your free trial covers all 20 specialist exams.

Start 7-day free trial

Quick recall flashcards

A small sample of the deck for this topic. Tap a question to reveal the answer. The full deck and spaced-repetition scheduler live inside Primex.

Classify the components of a standard preoperative airway assessment

- **History**: snoring, OSA, stridor, previous difficult airway, neck surgery/radiation - **External inspection**: obesity, short neck, micrognathia, retrognathia, macroglossia, facial hair, neck mass - **Mouth opening**: inter-incisor distance, dentition, tongue size - **Mallampati class**: oropharyngeal view with mouth open and tongue protruded - **Neck mobility**: atlanto-occipital extension, cervical range of motion - **Thyromental distance (TMD)**: chin to thyroid notch - **Sternomental distance**: chin to sternal notch - **Mandibular protrusion test (MPT)**: upper lip bite test - **Neck circumference**: proxy for obesity-related difficulty

What numerical thresholds for thyromental distance (TMD) and inter-incisor distance (IID) predict difficult laryngoscopy?

- TMD $< 6$ cm (or $< 3$ finger-breadths) predicts difficult laryngoscopy - TMD $< 6$ cm associated with a high, anterior larynx with limited submandibular space - IID $< 3$ cm (or $< 2$ finger-breadths) predicts restricted mouth opening - Sternomental distance $< 12.5$ cm (sitting, full neck extension) also predictive - These thresholds have poor positive predictive value in isolation; must be combined with other markers

Describe the Mallampati classification and its clinical significance in airway assessment

- Performed with patient sitting, mouth maximally open, tongue protruded, no phonation - **Class I**: soft palate, uvula, fauces, tonsillar pillars all visible - **Class II**: soft palate, uvula, fauces visible; pillars obscured - **Class III**: soft palate and base of uvula visible only - **Class IV**: soft palate not visible at all - Class III-IV associated with increased incidence of Cormack-Lehane grade 3-4 laryngoscopy - Sensitivity ~50%, specificity ~90%; best used in combination with other tests

Distinguish the Mallampati classification from the Cormack-Lehane grading system

- Mallampati: preoperative prediction tool - oropharyngeal view with awake patient, mouth open, tongue protruded - Mallampati: grades I-IV based on pharyngeal structures visible - Cormack-Lehane: intraoperative finding during direct laryngoscopy - CL Grade 1: full glottic opening visible - CL Grade 2: posterior glottis / arytenoids only - CL Grade 3: epiglottis only, no glottis seen - CL Grade 4: no recognisable laryngeal structures - Mallampati predicts CL grade; CL grade directly guides intubation strategy in real time - High Mallampati does NOT mandate a difficult airway plan without corroborating features

Start free trial