Home  /  FRACS Orthopaedic Surgery  /  Study notes  /  AC Joint Injuries: Rockwood Classification and Operative Reconstruction for Grade IV-VI

AC Joint Injuries: Rockwood Classification and Operative Reconstruction for Grade IV-VI

FRACS Orthopaedic Surgery LO FRACSORTHO_SEH_7 2,093 words
Free preview. This study note maps to learning objective FRACSORTHO_SEH_7 in the FRACS Orthopaedic Surgery curriculum. Inside Primex you get the full set of FRACS Orthopaedic Surgery notes, AI-graded SAQs and written-paper practice, voice viva with an AI examiner, exam-style MCQs, and a curriculum tracker that ticks off every learning objective as you go. For exam format, timeline and failure-mode commentary, see the FRACS Orthopaedic Surgery 2026 Study Guide.

Overview

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries account for approximately 12% of shoulder girdle injuries and are especially prevalent in young, active males involved in contact and collision sports. The spectrum ranges from minor ligamentous sprain to complete dislocation with displacement of the distal clavicle into or through adjacent soft tissues. While low-grade injuries (Rockwood I-II) are universally managed non-operatively and grade III management remains contested, grades IV, V, and VI are generally accepted operative lesions requiring coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction.


Anatomy and Biomechanics

Static Stabilisers

Structure Function
AC ligaments (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior capsule) Primary restraint to horizontal (anteroposterior) translation
CC ligament - conoid (posteromedial) Primary restraint to superior displacement (vertical stability)
CC ligament - trapezoid (anterolateral) Resists axial compression and horizontal displacement
Deltotrapezial fascia Secondary restraint; disrupted in grades IV-VI

Normal CC distance is approximately 11-13 mm; a >25% increase versus the contralateral side indicates CC ligament disruption. Complete dislocation can be seen with as little as a 25% increase in CC distance.

Dynamic Stabilisers

The deltoid and trapezius muscle origins from the distal clavicle are disrupted in grade V injuries (and partially in grade IV), contributing to marked superior displacement. The unopposed pull of the sternocleidomastoid muscle on the clavicle further exaggerates the deformity.

Biomechanical Principles of Reconstruction

Anatomic CC ligament reconstruction with a free soft-tissue graft (semitendinosus or anterior tibialis) more closely replicates the tensile stiffness and load-to-failure characteristics of the native conoid and trapezoid ligaments compared to non-anatomic techniques (e.g., classic Weaver-Dunn coracoacromial ligament transfer), which address vertical stability only and have inferior biomechanical properties.

$$\text{CC Distance Ratio} = \frac{\text{Injured CC distance}}{\text{Contralateral CC distance}} \times 100\%$$


Rockwood Classification

Grade Ligament Disruption Soft-Tissue Disruption Displacement Key Feature
I AC sprain; CC intact None None Radiograph normal or minimal
II AC torn; CC intact/stretched None <1 clavicle width superiorly; horizontal instability Clavicle may rise slightly; AP instability
III AC + CC torn Deltotrapezial intact 25-100% superior (≈1 clavicle width) Scapula droops; clavicle appears elevated
IV AC + CC torn Clavicle displaced into/through trapezius Posterior Axillary view essential; skin tenting posteriorly
V AC + CC torn Deltoid and trapezius completely detached from distal clavicle 100-300% superior Subcutaneous clavicle; gross skin tenting
VI AC + CC torn Deltotrapezial disrupted Inferior to coracoid, posterior to conjoined tendon (biceps + coracobrachialis) Rare; severe high-energy trauma; multiple associated injuries

Key Radiographic Principles


Clinical Assessment

History

Physical Examination

Finding Significance
AC joint point tenderness All grades
Visible/palpable step deformity Grades III-VI
Posterior skin tenting Grades IV-V
"Piano key" sign (reducible superior clavicle) Grades III-V
Cross-arm adduction test (arm 90° flexed, adducted across chest) AC joint compression pain
Scapular dyskinesis Altered kinematics; grades III-VI
Non-reducible posterior displacement Grade IV
Inability to reduce with downward traction Grades IV-VI

Associated Injuries


Non-operative Management

Grade Recommended Management
I Sling 1-2 weeks, ice, analgesia; early ROM
II Sling 1-2 weeks; periscapular strengthening; return to sport 2-6 weeks
III Non-operative first-line for most; supervised rehabilitation 3-6 months; operative reconstruction if symptomatic failure
IV-VI Operative reconstruction

Immobilisation devices for non-operative treatment include slings, adhesive tape strappings, braces, harnesses, and plaster casts; a simple sling is the most widely applied contemporary method. The principle is to support the weight of the upper extremity to reduce stress on the ligaments. Ice and analgesia during the first week are followed by periscapular strengthening, avoiding heavy lifting and contact sports during the strengthening phase.

For grades I and II, long-term outcomes at 8-10 years demonstrate no significant functional impairment or progressive arthritis compared to the contralateral side.

Grade III management remains controversial. Current evidence does not demonstrate superior functional outcomes for acute surgical treatment versus non-operative management at 12 months; the literature suggests the need for reoperation is higher among patients treated immediately with surgery than among those who undergo primary surgery after failed non-operative treatment. A small subgroup of young, high-level overhead athletes or heavy manual labourers may be offered acute reconstruction given the potential for altered scapular kinematics. The key principle is that patients who fail 3-6 months of supervised non-operative treatment retain excellent results with delayed reconstruction.


Operative Management

Indications

Indication Grade
Acute high-grade injury (absolute indication) IV, V, VI
Young active overhead athlete/heavy manual labourer III (selected)
Failed non-operative management (>3-6 months) III
Polytrauma patient with complete AC disruption III-VI
Chronic symptomatic complete dislocation III-VI

Polytrauma patients with AC joint injuries have demonstrably worse shoulder functional outcomes, supporting a lower threshold for operative management in this group.

Surgical Goals

  1. Anatomic reduction of the AC joint
  2. Restoration of CC ligament function (vertical and horizontal stability)
  3. Repair of the deltotrapezial fascia (mandatory in grades IV-VI)
  4. Distal clavicle resection in chronic cases (typically >6 weeks) to address AC arthrosis

Evolution of Surgical Techniques

Era Technique Key Limitation
Historical Transarticular AC pin fixation Hardware migration; catastrophic complications; abandoned
Historical Bosworth CC screw (1941) Temporary fixation only; requires planned second operation
Classic Weaver-Dunn (CA ligament transfer to distal clavicle, 1972) Non-anatomic; inferior biomechanics; higher failure rate
Modified classic Modified Weaver-Dunn + supplemental CC fixation Improved stability but remains non-anatomic
Contemporary Anatomic CC ligament reconstruction with free graft Preferred; anatomic; superior biomechanics
Contemporary Hook plate + ligament reconstruction Useful acutely; mandates planned plate removal
Evolving Arthroscopic-assisted CC reconstruction Minimally invasive; allows treatment of concomitant GH pathology

Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

This is the contemporary standard. Key examination points:

Graft options:

Graft Advantages Notes
Semitendinosus autograft High tensile strength; biological healing; superior outcomes vs modified Weaver-Dunn in comparative studies Donor site morbidity; harvest adds operative time
Anterior tibialis allograft No donor morbidity; ample length Preferred for injuries >2 weeks old to reduce risk of loss of reduction and implant complications; slower biological incorporation
Gracilis autograft Less donor morbidity than semitendinosus Smaller diameter; less commonly used

Critical technical principles (high-yield viva points):

Hook Plate

Arthroscopic-Assisted Reconstruction


Complications

Complication Notes
Loss of reduction / recurrent dislocation Most common; overall failure rate ~21.8% in meta-analysis
Overall complication rate ~14.2% in meta-analysis; no technique has demonstrated clear superiority
Coracoid fracture Risk with coracoid tunnel drilling; minimise tunnel diameter
Distal clavicle fracture Medialised or excessive clavicular tunnels
Implant failure / suture cut-out Suture tape fatigue before graft incorporation
Hardware migration (transarticular pins) Reason AC pin fixation was abandoned
Subacromial impingement / acromion erosion Hook plate left in situ; planned removal mandatory
AC joint arthrosis / DJD Common long-term; may require distal clavicle resection
Shoulder stiffness Deltotrapezial fascial scarring; inadequate rehabilitation
Neurovascular injury Medial brachial cutaneous nerve; musculocutaneous nerve near coracoid
Infection As per any open shoulder procedure
Pneumothorax / associated injuries Particularly relevant in high-energy grade VI

Outcomes


Paediatric Considerations


Management Summary

Grade Operative? Preferred Approach Key Principle
I No Sling, analgesia, early ROM Ligaments intact; excellent long-term prognosis
II No Sling, rehabilitation CC intact; horizontal instability only
III Controversial Non-operative first (3-6 months); delayed surgery if failed No high-level evidence favouring acute surgery
IV Yes Anatomic CC reconstruction ± hook plate Posterior displacement; axillary view essential
V Yes Anatomic CC reconstruction with free graft ± hook plate; deltotrapezial repair 100-300% displacement; complete soft-tissue stripping
VI Yes Anatomic CC reconstruction; thorough assessment and treatment of associated injuries Rare; high-energy; concomitant injuries frequent
Primex

Practice this topic in the app

Work through MCQs on this exact LO, run written or viva practice mapped to FRACSORTHO_SEH_7, or ask PRIMEX a clinical question framed for FRACS Orthopaedic Surgery. Your free trial covers all 20 specialist exams.

Start 7-day free trial

Quick recall flashcards

A small sample of the deck for this topic. Tap a question to reveal the answer. The full deck and spaced-repetition scheduler live inside Primex.

What are the primary stabilising structures of the AC joint?

The AC joint is stabilised by the acromioclavicular ligaments (superior and inferior), the coracoclavicular ligaments (conoid and trapezoid), and the joint capsule. The coracoclavicular ligaments are the primary restraint to superior displacement and clavicular translation; disruption leads to AC joint instability.

Describe the Rockwood classification for AC joint injuries.

Type I: Mild ligament sprain, AC joint intact, no widening. Type II: AC ligament torn, coracoclavicular ligament intact, mild widening (<25%). Type III: AC and coracoclavicular ligaments torn, moderate widening (25-100%), clavicle elevated. Type IV: CC ligaments completely torn, clavicle posteriorly displaced into trapezius. Type V: Severe CC ligament disruption, marked elevation (100-300%). Type VI: CC ligaments torn, clavicle inferior to coracoid (rare).

What is the typical mechanism of AC joint injury?

Direct fall on the tip of the shoulder (most common), fall on outstretched hand with arm adducted, or direct impact from collision. Higher-energy mechanisms (falls from height, motor vehicle accidents) produce higher-grade injuries. Sports participation (rugby, American football, ice hockey) accounts for many AC injuries.

What clinical examination findings would you expect in a Type III AC joint dislocation?

Visible prominence of the distal clavicle (step-off deformity), tenderness over the AC joint, pain with cross-arm adduction test (positive O'Brien's test variant), positive AC shear test, and loss of normal shoulder contour. Clavicle is palpably elevated relative to the acromion. Scapular positioning may be altered due to loss of CC ligament stability.

Start free trial